{"id":3131,"date":"2025-07-07T10:46:22","date_gmt":"2025-07-07T10:46:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/?page_id=3131"},"modified":"2026-03-09T12:34:13","modified_gmt":"2026-03-09T12:34:13","slug":"survey-design-2-4","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/resources\/cnes-knowledge-bank\/survey-design-2-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Survey design (2\/4)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Danish National Election Study (DNES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1971<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1973<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1975<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1977<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1979<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1981<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1984<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1987<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1988<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Panel respondents from 1987 survey<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1990<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1994<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Cluster sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1998<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Stratified sampling (by areas) from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2001<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2005<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) + panel respondents from 2001 survey<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Dual sample; stratified online panel (by sex, age, education) and stratified sample from Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) (area clustering)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview, paper and web questionnaires<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2011<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Stratified sample from Danish Civil Registration System (CPR)  (by region, gender, age)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>web questionnaire and face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR), only people under 76 years old<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>web questionnaire and face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>web, paper and telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2022<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Simple random sample from the Danish Civil Registration System (CPR) <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>web and paper questionnaires<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
European Election Study (EES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1979<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Various sampling procedures (quota sample and multi-stage random sample) according to country<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1989<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre & post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Multi-stage stratified random sample<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1994<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre & post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Multi-stage stratified random sample<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1999<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Random multi-stage sampling (except Spain, with quota sample)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2004<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Various sampling procedures: a random route method or a quota method (F2F survey), from the state electoral rolls (written survey). For telephone surveys, random digit dialing (RDD) was used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>Varies by country: telephone, paper, email, face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Random digit dial (RDD) sampling and last-birthday-method (for individuals)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone and face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2014<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Multi-stage random sample (by population size and density)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Quota samples from online access panels (by gender, age, region and level of urbanisation). Multi-stage random sample was used in Cyprus and Malta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>Web; except for Cyprus and Malta (using telephone interviews)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2024<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Quota samples from online access panels (by gender, age, education, region and level of urbanisation)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>Web; except for Malta (using web questionnaires and video interviews)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Finnish National Election Study (FNES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2003<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Multistage probability sample from national register (by region, municipality, address). Oversampling of Swedish-speakers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview and paper questionnaire (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Quota sampling based on age, gender, mother tongue, and province or constituency of residence<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview and paper questionnaire (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2011<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Quota sampling based on age, gender, mother tongue, and province or constituency of residence<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview and paper questionnaire (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Multistage probability sample (by region, municipality, mother tongue)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview and paper questionnaire (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Random route sampling with primary sampling units (PSUs). Stratified by quotas (gender, age, area and degree of urbanization)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>face-to-face interview and paper questionnaire (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2023<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling: <\/strong>Stratified probability sample (by age, gender, region, mother tongue)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>web and paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
French National Election Study (FES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1958<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel survey<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified random sampling (by regions)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: paper (with interviewer present)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1962<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Non-probabilistic quota sample (by municipality, sex, age and occupation of head of household)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1978<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Non-probabilistic quota sample (by sex, age, and occupation of head of household), after stratification by region and degree of urbanisation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1988<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Non-probabilistic quota sample (by sex, age, and occupation of head of household), after stratification by region and degree of urbanisation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1995<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Non-probabilistic quota sample (by sex, age, and occupation of head of household), after stratification by region and degree of urbanisation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1997<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Non-probabilistic quota sample (by sex, age, and occupation of head of household), after stratification by region and degree of urbanisation<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Stratified multistage probability sampling (by district, addresses, households)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2012<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Stratified multistage probability sampling (by district, addresses, households)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2017<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Non-probabilistic quota sample (by age, gender, occupation, education, region, degree of urbanisation, turnout in last election)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2022<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong>  Stratified random (probabilistic) online panel sample<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2024<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Online (quota) panel sample<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre & Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> ADM sample design, three-stage random sample (by region, household, target person). Oversampling of East Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2013<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre & Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> ADM sample design, three-stage random sample (by region, household, target person). Oversampling of East Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2017<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre & Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified probability sample (by municipality and address) from national register. Oversampling of East Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified probability sample (by municipality and address) from national register. Oversampling of East Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web and paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified probability sample (by municipality and address) from national register. Oversampling of East Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web and paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2025<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified probability sample (by municipality and address) from national register. Oversampling of East Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web and paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Hellenic (Greek) National Election Study (ELNES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random selection by area proportional to total phone population. Sample frame: telephone list database<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2012<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random Digit Dialing (RDD) by area proportional to total population. Sample frame: telephone list database<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web and face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random Digit Dialing (RDD) by area proportional to total population. Sample frame: telephone list database<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web and telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random Digit Dialing (RDD) from telephone list database + panel respondents from 2015 election study<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Icelandic National Election Study (ICENES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1983<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone, face-to-face interview and paper questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1987<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register & panel respondents from 1983 survey<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1991<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1995<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1999<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2003<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2013<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode: <\/strong>telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2016<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2017<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register & panel respondents from 2017 survey<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone and web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2024<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample drawn from national register & panel respondents from 2021 survey<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone and web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Irish National Election Study (INES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2002<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Multistage cluster sampling (by district, address and household)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2003<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from 2002 study<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2004<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from 2002 & 2003 studies<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2006<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from 2002-2004 studies<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: paper<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from 2002-2006 studies + refreshment sample<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face and paper (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2011<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random sample by district electoral divisions from census list<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face and paper (mail-back)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2016<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random probability sample recruited by Random Digit Dialling (RDD) + quota sample based on age, gender, education, region and social class.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2020<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Quota sample based on gender, age social class, region, work status, past vote and turnout<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2024<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> For face-to-face survey: Random Probability Sample, sampling by address, random choice of respondent within household based on next birthday method. For online survey: Quota sample based on gender, age social class, region, work status, past vote and turnout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview and web (for online panel sample only)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Israel National Election Studies (INES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1969<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Simple random sample from a governmental list of eligible voters<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1973<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Systematic sampling from a list of Jewish households<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1977<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Sample drawn from a governmental list of eligible voters<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1981<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Locality type strata, locality clusters, simple random sampling of streets, and Kish sampling within households<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1984<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Locality type strata, locality clusters, simple random sampling of streets, and Kish sampling within households<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1988<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Locality type strata, locality clusters, simple random sampling of streets, and Kish sampling within households<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1992<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Locality type strata, locality clusters, simple random sampling of streets, and Kish sampling within households<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1996<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Non-proportional stratified sample of the population with locality type strata and locality clusters<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1999<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Proportional stratified sample of the population with locality type strata and locality clusters<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: face-to-face interviews (phase 1) & telephone (phase 2)<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2001<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample of Jews and Arabs by geographical areas, random sampling within each stratum. Additional quotas of ultra-orthodox and ex-USSR immigrant populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2003<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample of Jews and Arabs by geographical areas, random sampling within each stratum. Additional quotas of ultra-orthodox and ex-USSR immigrant populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2006<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample of Jews and Arabs by geographical areas, random sampling within each stratum. Additional quotas of ultra-orthodox and ex-USSR immigrant populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample: random sample of Jewish individuals from population listing and stratified Arab sample (by regional areas, random sampling within each stratum).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2013<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample: random sample of Jewish individuals from population listing and stratified Arab sample (by regional areas, random sampling within each stratum).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2015<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample: random sample of Jewish individuals from population listing and stratified Arab sample (by region).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2019-2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample: random sample of Jewish individuals from population listing and stratified sample of Arab households (by district and religion)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone and web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2022<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre- and post-election study<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Probabilistic online panel sample, built using phone-based recruitment from the Ministry of Interior’s population register. Complementary phone interviews with Arab-speaking respondents<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Italian National Election Studies (ITANES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

1992<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Convenience sample from a list of municipalities defined by Istituto Cattaneo<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1994<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sampling from the official list of landline telephone numbers<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

1996<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sampling from the official list of landline telephone numbers<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2001<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random sampling from electoral register using door-to-door walk-in<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2006<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Random sampling from electoral register using door-to-door walk-in, stratification by sex and age<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2008<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sampling from the official list of landline telephone numbers from the municipalities used in the Itanes 2006 study<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode<\/strong>: telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2013<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Random sampling from electoral register using door-to-door walk-in<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2018<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> multistage stratified random sampling + online access panel sample<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> Web and telephone (for CSES sample) + web only for online access panel sample<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2022<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Panel study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Stratified sample (by age, gender and geographical location) from online access panel<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Japanese Electoral Studies (JES)<\/summary>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2001<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Multistage systematic sampling from electoral register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face and telephone interviews<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2003<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from 2001 study<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2004<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post<\/strong> election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from previous waves<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2005<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from previous waves<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2007<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Multistage systematic sampling from electoral register<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2009<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from previous waves<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2010<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from previous waves<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> face-to-face interview<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2012<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Quota sampling and panel respondents from previous wave(s)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> Web, paper and telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2013<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Quota sampling and panel respondents from previous wave(s)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> Web, paper and telephone<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2014<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Quota sampling<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2016<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling:<\/strong> Panel respondents from previous waves<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> paper questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2017<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Quota sampling<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2019<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Quota sampling<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2021<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Quota sampling<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

2022<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Pre and post <\/strong>election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Quota sampling<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n

2024<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Post election study<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sampling<\/strong>: Quota sampling<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Survey mode:<\/strong> web questionnaire<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
< Previous<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
Next ><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
Back to data access<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Questions? write us: info@cnes.community<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Questions? write us: info@cnes.community<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":649,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3131","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3131"}],"version-history":[{"count":44,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3516,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3131\/revisions\/3516"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cnes.community\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}